|To: Martin Piccoli
University of Pennsylvania
209 South 33rd St., DRL Build.
||From: Stephen Goodfellow
146 Farrand Park
(313) 883 4827
Dear Martin, 11/02/89
I have enclosed a copy of the update on solar research in Science News for you ("Making Sunshine", 10/28/89, Vol. 136 pp.280.) Upon
occasion I get something published in the letter section of Science News, specifically
within the realm of stellar activity. ('Letters' 5/17/80
p.307, 8/17/85 p.107.)
You will find a paper, " Can Gravity be Induced?" enclosed; which directly
relates to the field that the mentioned article addresses. You will see that the solar
model I suggest is radically different from the conventionally accepted models.
I welcome the advent of advanced neutrino detection since it will eventually confirm the
model suggested in this paper (see p.8).
With regards to the Science News article - your own Raymond Davis predicts a drop in
the neutrino flux during the high point of the solar cycle. John N. Bahcall thinks Davis'
earlier data is a freak.
I am cock sure that John N. Bahcall will be proven wrong; the result will confirm Davis'
previous data. His results are indeed no fluke. (I wonder if I can I get in on that bottle
of French wine bet?)
The reason the new result will be in agreement is because the Sun's interior is - read the
next bit slowly - a magnetically unified plasma creating a gravity inducing Absolute
vacuum through which nothing can pass. (Phew!) Solar activity occurs only in the
enveloping plasma sheath around this non-space and only neutrinos from the side of the sun
that faces the observer can be detected. That's why all those neutrinos are missing.
Keep up the good work and drop me a line sometime; send me any comments, papers or
information you think might be of interest to me.