Article Status:
*** Illustration(s) Status: *** |
Sex on Campus
Sex! Sex! Sex! Is
that all university students are thinking about? Apparently so,
and doing it, according to the largest college sex survey since
the 1953 Kinsey Report.
The results appear in a new book commissioned by the trendy men's
magazine, Details, titled, Sex On Campus: The Naked Truth
About the Real Sex Lives of College Students (Random House).
The juiciest findings made their way into the publication's fifth
annual "Sex Issue" in an article entitled, "Crazy
Sexy School."
The results suggest the 1960s sexual revolution is continuing at
a pace exhibiting a startling disregard for the dire warnings
present in the era of AIDS. 80% of the respondents say they've
had sex, have had an average of 6.4 partners, with over half
making love at least once a week. Probably most surprising, and a
turn around from the statid 50s, women are more sexually active
than men with 36 percent having sex two to three times a week,
while only 25 percent of males reporting this frequency.
Although such statistics and lurid titles are probably enough to
make a parent yank their kids off of any campus other than
Michigan's Aquinas College, co-authors Leland Elliot and Cynthia
Brantly say they have published not just an informative look at
youthful sexual attitudes and practices, but an informative
how-to guide for everything from birth control to graphic details
about performing sex acts.
The two authors devised, along with input from Random House and
Details editors, a list of 150 multiple choice questions which
were sent to 20,.000 college students from a national marketing
database that included academic institutions, large and small,
public and private, secular and religious. Although only nine
percent (1,752 in all) returned the anonymous questionaires,
Willard & Shulman, a Greewich, Conn. research firm, weighted
the responses to reflect the student population as a whole.
"We were told this was a fantastic response," Brantley
told the Metro Times, "particularly for this kind of
survey."
The 28-year-old Brantley says the idea for the book came from a
conversation she had with her co-author. "We were talking
about some of the goofs we made in college and some of the things
we didn't know and wish we had." She fears that although
sexual activity is widespread today among students, "They're
not doing it well or doing it wisely."
She cites her survey showing 55 percent of the respondents say
they don't always have safe sex during intercourse and that it is
rarely practiced during oral sex. Brant says the study showed
little concern for the range of sexually transmitted diseases
(STD) health professionals have gone to great lengths to warn
people about.
"We tried to stress in the book," Brantley says,
"HIV is just one of the many unpleasant things that can
happen to you. The number one STD reported was genital warts
which are highly contagious and very difficult to cure."
Apparently the college sex scene is a straight one. 92 percent of
the students identified themselves as heterosexual, with a
surprisingly low two percent choosing homosexuality as their
sexual orientation, about 10 percent below the national adult
level. However, strong tolerance or support was shown by the
majority for gay or other alternative sexuality such as
bisexuality. 77 percent either agreed, "It's a little weird,
but whatever," echoing the quintessential 90s attitude, or
its varient, "It's great; whatever turns you on."
Still, over half of those listing themselves as homosexual said
they had been "teased, harassed or attacked" because of
their sexual identification.
Although the 6.4 average number of sex parents sounds high, 42
percent reported only having had one or two partners in their
lives. "This seeming disparity is a result of the more
active students throwing the curve," according to Brantley.
And, in a toss to old fashioned romance, a whopping 54 percent
said love was the most important ingredient for a good sex life,
with communication a close second. But even romance can often
have a rushed and inconvenient setting. 70 percent said they had
made love in a car, 65 percent outside, 28 percent in a public
building, and, when the cat's away, 41 percent in their parent's
bed.
"They want to be in love," Brantley concludes.
"They're looking for relationships and within the context of
this, they're having a lot of sex." She agrees there are
problems with date and aquaintance rape and difficulties brought
on by drugs and alcohol, but thinks mostly, "These are a
wholesome bunch of kids."
Brantly and Elliott's findings are cheering for the advocates of
sexual freedom, but how reliable are the statistics? For
instance, is it possible that heterosexual, sexually active
students over-responded and skewed the findings? Although the
survey authors say they are satisfied with the number of students
answering the questionaires, a local statistical analyist thinks
otherwise. "Ten percent is not good," observes Michael
Kruger of Databusters, a Detroit research design firm. "It's
a low sample."
He says the survey results were taken at "face
validity," whereas more research would have to be done to
have supportable data. "With a low sample it's hard to
conjecture who is responding and why," says Kruger.
"Just the act of sending back the questionaire in this
survey distinguishes a respondent from the other 90 percent who
received it."
He suggests one way to validate the findings would be to do a
random check of nine percent of the students who didn't respond
and see if their answers were consistent with those who did.
Follow-up interviews could also check the truthfulness of answers
on a subject that, along with income, often receive less than
honest replies.
Other factors alter responses to surveys including what pollsters
call the "halo effect"the desire on the part of
respondents to appear normal or to give answers they think the
questioner wants. For instance, most men know it's proper to say
love is what counts for a good sexual relationship, rather than
come off like a clod who wants a "good body," to which
only three percent admitted.
Others, including Brantley's fellow Generation Xer Katie Roiphe,
author of Last Night in Paradise: Sex and Morals at Century's
End (Little Brown), outright doubt the lusty life portrayed
by the campus survey. Roiphe thinks there has been a reaction
against the sexual revolution creating a new conservative
morality and a limiting of sexual expression.
Contrary to the campus sex findings, Roiphe sees a resurgent
puritanism characterized by obsession with "safety,"
resulting in abstinence, monogamy, and even so-called
"secondary virginity" (you did it before, but not again
until marriage). She says, "Young people are searching for
moral order in a chaotic and ambivalent sexual climate."
Although AIDS has not spread as predicted through drug-free,
middle-class Americans, Roiphe feels the country was poised for a
sexual backlash after a wild, carnal ride through the 60s and
70s. "The turn in morality, the sexual counter-revolution,
started before AIDS," she argues. She points to the language
in early 1980s articles about herpes heralding the end of the
sexual revolution in the exact language used several years later
when HIV epidemic arrived. "It's a very puritanical American
concept," according to Roiphe, "that one moment of
pleasure will create a lifetime of remorse, or now with AIDS, a
direct link between sex and death."
She thinks fear of the epidemic serves a purpose beyond health
precautions. "Out of this anxiety about disease we've
created a new moral system which creates limits in an otherwise
limitless world," she says. "It's part of a desire to
go back to a less complicated time."
Roiphe, who lectures extensively on college campuses, says
students seem to be grasping for someone to tell them how to lead
their personal life. She points to the popularity of the 50s
mentality, How-To-Trap-A-Guy book, The Rules, as an
indication of a larger quest for more structure in life.
"The whole idea that you can sleep with whoever you want, do
whatever you want, with no taboos, and no limits but your own
desires," she says, "is quite terrifying to many young
people."
Roiphe admits part of her has sympathy with hedonism and
recklessness, "Particularly," she says, "when I
hear fear and caution and absolute conservatism from the mouth of
a 16-year-old." But she says, "Total promiscuity has
its costs, so we need to find some middle-ground. The totally
permissive society puts too much of a burden on the individual to
create meaning for themselves."
Roiphe doesn't downplay the dangers of AIDS and other STDs, but
thinks its sad that young people have been
"over-terrified" about the threat of disease. For
instance, she bristles at the substitution by some of
"safer-sex" for the more commonly used term. "For
young people, sex has become a matter of risk and caution,"
she laments. "The terms in which they think of their first
kiss has been transformed dramatically from what it was a
generation or two ago."
Send mail to stephen@goodfellow with questions
or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1997 Peter Werbe Article Database
Last modified: October 21, 1997