Article Status:
*** Illustration(s) Status: *** |
by Peter Werbe
Neither Bob Dole spent much time during the recent
presidential candidate's debate talking about Republican promises
to repeal the law banning certain assault weapons. Each for their
own purpose probably would like to let the matter rest. Still,
the furor over the ban suggests more than the "right to bear
arms."
The gun is America's totem-a bizarre symbol of a land which has
almost as many firearms as people. Guns play a strange role in
our national life and, like cars, represent emotions far beyond
what their utility is supposed to provide.
When you see men walking around with t-shirts declaring, "My
wife, yes; My dog, maybe; My gun, never!", you know you're
dealing with something more than a lust for hunting or the
anticipation of defense against some future tyranny. You can hear
the voices of the gun nuts seething with rage on right-wing talk
shows, swearing they will die before giving up their weapons.
Conservative politicians and aging rock stars make political
capital out of the hysteria and guys who were playing splatball
six months ago are forming armed militias to prepare for a
showdown with the government in Montana.
Rather than there being any authentic threat to either our
freedom or to gun ownership, all of the commotion seems more a
growing pathology on the part of those white males who feel their
traditional status and privilege eroding, their wages dropping,
and who know blue collar jobs are going to Mexico and
middle-level white collar positions are being hatcheted
wholesale. Previously, the average white American male had a
small piece of the pie and possessed a racial and gender
identification with the ruling elite, giving them a sense of
social superiority. Now, with their income and status under
assault, many middle- and working-class guys furiously blame
their woes on liberals, minorities, women, gays and the poor.
This intense process of denial relieves them from confronting the
real source of their anxiety and threat to their lifestyle-the
continuing assault on the poor and middle-class by the rich.
To these guys, gun control represents the final emasculation-the
severing of the last bastion of what they perceive as their
power. The fantasy of perforating a trespasser with their Tec-9
assault pistol has been taken away from them by the politicians
in Washington.
Although they chatter endlessly about the Second Amendment and
their right to possess any gun they choose, these are people
whose politics make them the least likely to object to government
polices. They are involved in the circular reasoning of wanting
to have guns to protect themselves from a government which might
try to take their guns away. However, as we saw during the
hideous government slaughter at Waco, stockpiling guns is a cop
magnet and rather than providing security from the ravages of
tyranny, assures it.
In any event, the Constitution is a weak pillar for supporting
gun ownership. The founding WORMs (white, old rich men) sought
political guarantees for their class of wealthy planters, but
greatly feared the common people and made sure that only white,
property-owning males benefited from democracy in the new nation.
They had no desire to see the lower orders armed. The U.S.
Supreme has consistently held that the real emphasis of the
Second Amendment is in the "well-regulated" phrase, not
the "right to bear arms" and has never overturned any
law restricting weapons.
However, given the level of national concern, the question should
be asked, is there an actual increase in violent crime or are we
subject to the latest media spasm?
For most of the population, statistics from the U.S. Department
of Justice's National Crime Victimization Survey show violent
crime has remained at a fairly constant level for 20 years and
has even dropping recently. Murder, for instance, has remained at
a consistent 9.3 per 100,000 people, and while making us the
industrial world's most violent nation, doesn't conform to the
image of rising danger. The murder rate for white males is 4.6
per 100,000, little different than the statistics for males in
France and Italy.
What has changed dramatically are economic conditions for much of
the urban working class, minorities and the poor. During the
Reagan/Bush era, the bottom dropped out for the lower third of
the population and it is only common sense that the poorer you
are the more likely you are to be the victim of a crime or commit
a crime. For instance, blacks make up only 12 percent of the
population, but are 50 percent of murder victims. The murder rate
for black men is a staggering 32.1 per 100,000, a figure near the
highest in the world.
The suburban middle class, isolated from the areas of actual
increased violence, react with panic to media reports and
nervously await shots to ring out in their neighborhood. But
white fear of black crime bears little relationship to reality,
either; 91 percent of white killings are committed by other
whites, while 87 percent of blacks are murdered by blacks.
Drive-by shootings, kids with guns, the murder of tourists and an
increase in mass murders seem to have produced a new level of
violence, but in reality it's the same old bloody nation with the
slaughter magnified by media hype.
But regardless, support for gun control or opposition to it will
remain the stuff of talk shows and posturing in the political
arena. Legislation strictly regulating firearms is not on the
political agenda and even if passed, such laws wouldn't work
anyway. An attempt at gun prohibition would meet with the same
mass disobedience which similar efforts against alcohol and drug
have met.
But at this point in our history, guns have little or nothing to
do with ridding this nation of its plague of violence. Real
solutions mean addressing the problems of social justice and
maldistribution of income, something neither Clinton liberals nor
Bob Dole conservatives are willing to do.
To download this article for publication. go to "file" on your browser and save the desired article as text.
Send mail to webmaster@goodfelloweb.com with questions
or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1997 Peter Werbe Article Database
Last modified: October 21, 1997