Article Status:
*** Illustration(s) Status: *** |
Smoke? Don't smoke? It apparently doesn't matter to some
large health maintenance organizations (HMOs) whether you do or
you don't; they profit either way.
According to information compiled by Disclosure Information
Services of Bethesda, Md., Prudential, the largest supplier of
health insurance and biggest operator of for-profit HMOs, also
owns significant shares of five of the six largest tobacco
companies. totalling almost a quarter billion dollars.
Prudential's investment portfolio includes $100 million each in
Philip Morris and in Lowes, maker of Kent and Newport, over $36
million in American Brands (Lucky Strike and Carlton), and $12 in
RJR Nabisco stock.
And, Prudential isn't the only big HMO with interests in both the
coffin nail and health businesses. Travelers Insurance holds $51
million in American Brand stocks and $37 million in RJR
Nabisco,while Cigna, another major insurer, has $57 million in
Philip Morris and $18 million in American Brands.
Dr. Susan Steigerwalt, president of Physicians for a National
Health Program (PNHP), calls these investments
"outrageous." Steigerwalt, who is director of the
hypertension clinic at Detroit's Henry Ford Hospital, sees the
results of smoking every day. She says, "It is completely
inconsistent for a so-called health provider to even be remotely
involved in profitting from tobacco products."
Steigerwalt points to statistics showing health costs totalling
billions of dollars as a direct result of smoking which leads to
ailments such as heart disease, cancer and high blood pressure.
She says, "Stopping smoking is the single most important
risk factor modification anyone can make to reduce all of the
major diseases Americans are plagued with." The heart of the
contradiction, according to PNHP, a 7,000-member doctors' group
advocating universal, publicly financed health care, is that the
HMOs have enormous excess profits, and even with a spate of
recent bad press, the tobacco companies remain good investments.
A more cynical view is put forth in The Lancet, the British
medical journal, which calls such investments "a briliant
win-win financial ploy, much like a combination
veterinarian/taxidermist who promises that `either way you get
your dog back.'" That is, the insurance companies collect
premiums from non-smokers to whom they pay few claims, then
demand higher premiums from smokers, while they reap huge profits
from tobacco investments. This viability is in large part
determined by the fact that the number of tobacco market
customers remains constant though 1,000 of them in the U.S. die
daily from their addiction. However, an equal number of
replacements are recruited from children and from a staggering
increase in Third World countries where often 80% of men smoke.
Steigerwalt cites the average age in the U.S. for first time
smokers as 13.
"These investments point out the problems with the growth of
for-profit HMOs," she says. All other industrial countries
have government-financed health plans, but if current trends
continue, the U.S. may be the first to have corporate-run health
care.
Steigerwalt says, "This will mean a system with no concern
for the patient or the provider; just how much money the
corporation can make."-Peter Werbe
Physicians for A National Health Program can be reached at 332 S. Michigan, Suite 500, Chicgo IL 60604; 312-554-0382.
Send mail to webmaster@goodfelloweb.com with questions
or comments about this web site.
Copyright © 1997 Peter Werbe Article Database
Last modified: October 21, 1997