|
|
Home |
Affidavits
Proof of correspondence discussing "Can
Gravity be induced?"
Refutation of
C. Leshan claims that I pirated his "idea"
Here is my shortlist
of individuals backing up my claim that I discussed "Can
Gravity be Induced?" prior to Mr. Leshan's 1994 publication.
|
To whom it may concern:
I hereby affirm that on 21st May 1987 I received from Stephen
Goodfellow a copy of his paper entitled "The Dynamic Gravac
Sun".
The covering letter indicates that Mr Goodfellow had been
working on a gravity/vacuum theory for the previous eight years.
In September
1987 I received from Mr Goodfellow a revised paper entitled "Can
Gravity be Induced?". These documents are still in my
possession.
John Legon, BS
Surrey, UK
28th
September 2009
|
In 1979 and '80, I spent many hours
listening carefully to my friend Stephen Goodfellow explain
his ideas about something he called "induced gravity." I
was an undergraduate then and had had a few years worth of
biology and chemistry classes, but little physics, so I had
to listen very hard to Stephen to follow his ideas. I
remember doing so with great fascination. He was very
thorough. And when, occasionally, I challenged Stephen
to clarify a claim or assertion of evidence, he listened and
then returned to those topics later, demonstrating that
he worked through his examination process more thoroughly.
I was one, among many,
who listened to Stephen as he worked through his
"Can Gravity Be Induced?" exploration. I marveled at his
diligence, curiosity, and intellectual excitement, as I
still do.
As regards the date of
these conversations: There is absolutely no question that
they occurred in Detroit prior to 1981 when I moved
to California.
Jackie Jablonski
Port Huron, MI
Professor of English,
M.A. English Literature,
San Francisco State University
|
To whom it may
concern:
I have
known Stephen Goodfellow for over 30 years as a friend, co-owner
of real estate in Michigan, and have spent countless hours in
conversation across wide-ranging areas of discussion. As long as
I have known Stephen, which dates back to the late 1970’s, he
has always proposed the concept of gravity induction. Although I
did not really understand the significance of the phenomena, I
could clearly see that Stephen felt quite strongly about his
hypothesis and proposed mechanisms for how this could be
accomplished. These discussions date back to at least the early
1980’s as well as I can remember.
Stephen has had a long-time interest in theoretical physics that
dates back to his childhood in England from what he has told me.
Despite my lack of understanding and appreciation for most of
the phenomena he discusses, it has been quite clear to me that
Stephen has a very intense and sincere hunger for an
understanding of the universe and the mysteries of the forces
that shape it.
Sincerely,
Michael Kruger
Statistical Analyst and Instructor
Wayne State University School of Medicine
Dept. of OB/GYN
C.S. Mott Center
275 E. Hancock St.
Detroit, MI 48220
|
To whom it may concern,
It has been my good fortune to know Mr. Stephen Goodfellow since
1975, first as a house mate, then as a friend and fellow artist.
Together we have participated together in numerous art
exhibitions in the USA and abroad, collaborated to create the
micropointillist painting technique and participated in creative
efforts since then.
I have continuously known and had frequent contact with Mr.
Goodfellow since first meeting him and quite possibly know him
more than does any other person.
Beyond his well-established reputation as one of Detroit’s most
renowned fine artists, Mr. Goodfellow is a person of many
talents and interests, chief among which is astrophysics, an
interest in which he developed in the mid-1970’s and the
knowledge of which he has grown continuously ever since.
By 1979 Mr. Goodfellow had evolved a theory that essentially
proposed that the sun does not contain a solid core but is void in
its interior. [The actual concept is more far more complex than
that but I describe it here as such for purposes of brevity.]
This was first publicly expressed in his 1979 paper “Can Gravity
Be Induced” which was widely propagated among the creative
community in Detroit and other parties. The concept was also
expressed in numerous paintings which he displayed in
exhibitions from those years forward to the present.
Mr. Goodfellow and I have shared hundreds of conversations
dating from the 1970’s to the present, many in which the ideas
in “Can Gravity Be Induced” were discussed at length. As a
result I can completely confirm the authenticity of Mr.
Goodfellow’s assertion that he alone formulated and propagated
the concepts as laid out in “Can Gravity Be Induced” beginning
in 1979 and continuing to the present. If necessary I will be
willing to swear this in a legal affidavit and testify as to his
veracity.
Lowell Boileau
Owner and Director
AtDetroit, LLC
31505 Grand River, Suite 301 Box 14B
Farmington, MI 48336 USA
www.AtDetroit.com
Lowell@DetroitYES.com
Fine Artist
www.AtDetroit.net
www.DetroitYES.com
|
|
To whom it may concern,
I have been a close friend
and confidant of Stephen Goodfellow's for many years going back
as far as the late 70's. During my years as biostatistician at
Wayne State University we met often for lunch to discuss
scientific and geopolitical issues in the cafes of the
university district. Stephen is an astute empiricist with an
uncanny ability to predict and cipher natural phenomena and
events. He has long held his beliefs about the induction of
gravity. I believe it was in the mid 1980s was when he first
stated talking to me about his ideas of gravity induction. No
question should exist about his vociferous and enthusiastic
portrayal of his ideas of, 'Can Gravity be Induced', for at
least the the last 25 years.
Sincerely,
D.C. Lee
Masters in Mathematical Statistics
Research Statistician |
|
Return |
|